As healthcare continues to shift decisively towards value-based care, hospitals and healthcare systems are under increasing pressure to control total procedural costs while maintaining high-quality outcomes. In response, many are experimenting with alignment strategies that include using post-acute providers that bill under professional fees only. While these models may initially look better with lower costs, they may not deliver the comprehensive, responsive care that patients require for optimal recovery. For complex procedures like joint replacements, the quality of post-surgical rehabilitation directly impacts recovery time, comfort, and long-term patient outcomes.
Home health care, specifically services delivered under Medicare Part A provided by agencies like GrandCare Health, is designed to support full recovery through a patient-centered, structured approach. In contrast, outpatient therapy providers that come to the home and bill under Medicare Part B often lack the depth of resources, oversight, and customization available in traditional home health. While these outpatient providers may appear lower cost, they are not structured to meet the diverse needs of post-surgical patients in a way that maximizes both patient outcomes and cost savings over the long term.
Why Home Health Care is Essential After Surgery
Home health provides the highest standard of care during the critical early stages of recovery. GrandCare Health’s model includes skilled nursing, physical therapy, and other essential services coordinated within a comprehensive care plan. This level of support helps patients avoid complications—such as infections or setbacks in mobility—that could lead to costly readmissions or prolonged recovery. In addition, if patients require further rehabilitation after home health, they can transition seamlessly to outpatient therapy, continuing their recovery with the solid foundation that only home health can provide.
Key Benefits of Home Health Care
- Customized, Coordinated Care Plans
GrandCare Health develops individualized care plans, addressing not only therapy but also skilled nursing and patient education. This holistic model meets patients’ physical and emotional needs as they recover. A coordinated care approach helps patients achieve functional outcomes more efficiently than outpatient services alone, which are typically limited to therapy sessions and lack broader medical oversight. - Regulatory Oversight to Ensure Quality and Reduce Complications
GrandCare Health, as a Medicare Part A provider, is held to rigorous quality standards that include regular audits, detailed quality reporting, and both Medicare and state inspections. This high level of oversight reduces risks and complications, helping to prevent costly hospital readmissions. Outpatient in-home therapy providers, with fewer regulatory demands, often miss the chance to catch and manage complications early on, leading to unanticipated expenses and care disruptions. - Smooth Transition to Outpatient Therapy When Necessary
When further rehabilitation is needed, home health patients can transition smoothly to outpatient therapy centers. GrandCare’s approach, which prioritizes in-home recovery, establishes a foundation for successful long-term outcomes. The sequence of starting with home health before moving to outpatient therapy—when needed—supports a more complete and effective recovery.
The Cost Perspective: True Savings Come from Comprehensive Care
Outpatient therapy services may seem more cost-effective upfront but lack the intensive resources and accountability that distinguish home health care. GrandCare Health’s services, billed under a facility-fee structure, allow us to deliver a wide range of in-home services efficiently and cost-effectively. This approach keeps the overall episode cost manageable while ensuring that patients receive high-quality, personalized care in their home environment.
Outpatient in-home physical therapy providers are typically limited to therapy-only sessions and lack the interdisciplinary collaboration, coordination, and regulatory oversight that Medicare Part A home health provides. This difference in service scope can have serious implications for long-term patient outcomes. By avoiding complications and achieving better functional outcomes, comprehensive home health care ultimately supports value-based care goals more effectively than surface-level savings.
Comparison: Home Health Care vs. Outpatient In-Home Therapy
For hospital leaders focused on achieving value-based care, home health is the most reliable and cost-effective choice for post-surgical recovery. GrandCare’s model not only enhances patient outcomes through comprehensive, personalized care but also supports long-term cost efficiency by preventing complications and ensuring a smooth transition to outpatient therapy when required.
In comparison, outpatient in-home therapy providers may appear lower cost, but they often lack the essential services, clinical oversight, and accountability needed to meet the complex needs of post-surgical patients. Selecting home health after surgery is a choice for quality, safety, and efficiency—one that outpatient therapy operating under Part B simply cannot match. For patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers striving for high-quality outcomes within a value-based model, home health remains the superior option.
Based on Medicare Claims Data (2022-2023), here are the compelling reasons for hospitals participating in Value-Based Care (VBC) models to choose home health:
- Better Hospital Readmission Performance
- GrandCare readmission rate >4%
- Home Health readmission rate: 15.8%
- SNF readmission rate: 22.4%
- Outpatient readmission rate: 19.2%
- Impact: Lower readmission rates directly affect VBC payments and hospital penalties
- Superior Quality Metrics
- GrandCare HCAPS 5/5
- Higher functional improvement scores (71.2% vs 65.7% benchmark)
- Better mobility outcomes (74.3% vs 68.9% benchmark)
- Higher patient satisfaction (84.2% vs 78.6% average)
- These metrics directly impact:
- Hospital Compare ratings
- VBC quality scores
- Patient satisfaction scores
- Risk Mitigation
- Lower ED utilization (12.4% vs 18.7% for SNF)
- Earlier intervention with complications
- Better medication management
- Real-time communication with physicians
- All reducing potential penalties under VBC models
- Episode Control
- Direct oversight of patient progress
- Immediate intervention capability
- Seamless communication with the hospital team
- Better care coordination, which is crucial for bundled payments
Let us know your thoughts, and don’t forget to subscribe to receive new updates!
